Is It Shallow To Go For Looks?

good looks shallow

 

This post on good looks and being shallow was originally written and published on 16/03/2008 on my old site, ‘The God Is You’, and may conflict with my current philosophy.

 

AS A MAN who appreciates beautiful women, my oft-wandering eye is regularly met with disapproval and remarks such as “She’s not a piece of meat!” or “There’s more to a woman than her looks!” or “She’s probably a bitch!”, such is society’s general perception of physically attractive women.

The average spectator’s first reaction to any display of visual desire for something – human (sexual), material or natural (not so much) – is always one of haughty disapproval coupled with a self-righteous, indiscriminate labelling of the ‘looker’ as non-spiritual, superficial, heartless and ’shallow’. But what does it mean to be shallow? A dictionary definition enlightens, as usual…

Lacking depth of intellect, emotion, or knowledge.

So What Does This Mean, Exactly? (This Is Interesting)

So to prejudge someone as being shallow in light of an admirer’s approval of someone for their good looks is to assume that this is where the qualifying of a potential partner stops. As the definition states, to qualify someone based solely on their looks is to be indifferent toward that person’s personality, the looks being enough to satisfy one’s evident lack of intellectual depth and emotion. To the humanpreneur, though, having good looks is merely a foot in a door – a big foot in the door for an physical attractive woman, and a minor step for a good looking man.

When it comes to physical beauty, men and women are similar in that they are attracted to it, but that’s where the similarities end. If a woman is physically attractive, it’s a big plus in the eyes of admiring men. Further, interestingly, generally, a woman’s self confidence is directly proportionate to her looks. The more beautiful the woman, the more life-smart she is likely to be.

The Curse Of Beauty For Women…

Women of beauty, from an early age, have had a lot of attention growing up which they quickly build upon and turn into self-awareness, self confidence and guile. With good looking men, there is no such correlation. Handsome men are not as sought after professionally or emotionally as . For men, a strong, dominant, ambitious personality, along with humour, social intuition, wealth, good health and good social value – are more vital characteristics for life progression and the attracting of women.

For an attractive man, when he approaches an attractive woman, his good looks are merely a foot in the door and that’s it. If the man hasn’t got the chops to back it up, he’s toast – and the more beautiful the woman, the quicker he’ll likely fry, since her value will likely be superior to his. attracts equal value, so a high value male will likely attract equally high value females.

And, interestingly, since beautiful, feminine looks are important as far as men’s idea of their ideal women are concerned (for evolutionary reasons of their likelihood of bearing beautiful, healthy offspring), and since women of beauty generally ‘have their shit together’, a man of high value will most likely be seen with a beautiful woman/women. So the level of beauty of a man’s female partner is a good barometer of his self confidence and value.

A Mixed-Up Idea (That Is Unfortunately Common)

Conversely, when a good looking man has a female partner whom isn’t particularly attractive, he is labelled as not being shallow – the ugliness of a woman serving as as an indicator of the level of a man’s genuineness: the uglier the woman, the more genuine the man is perceived to be. Meaning that he must actually be with the woman because of her personality, since she is ugly enough not to be attractive to men.

But this would be to assume that he was in fact attracted to her personality. Who’s to say he is not with her for another reason entirely? Such is the prejudice of the ignorant. The truth is that the man with the unattractive partner is most probably lacking in confidence, or has low self esteem.

Some men will often say they are not attracted to overly attractive girls – often referring to them as ‘Barbie girls’ – as a defence and unwitting admission that they are not high value enough for these girls and, in fact, are intimidated both by them AND the attainment of higher value. They settle for an average, unattractive girl, and hence concede – lying to themselves – that the beauty and brilliance out there that they desire deep down is for ‘the lucky few’ and not for them.

We ALL Like To Tick Boxes… Tell Me YOU Don’t!

Men and women tick boxes when sizing up potential partners, whether they know it or not. Looks are generally top of the list for men – including me – when qualifying women. I mean, in a crowded room – and with limited time – a woman’s obvious good looks allow me to immediately tick the first box before then moving on to the next criterion.

Next on the list of what men look for are things like age (a man’s genes have more chance of replicating with a younger, fitter woman), hip-to-waste ratio, femininity, among others. Women place leadership and top, so she – and any potential offspring – will be adequately protected. This is why you can find ugly men with beautiful women. Thus answering that age old question, “What is she doing with him?”

The more boxes someone ticks, the higher their value. Value attracts equal value. A beautiful woman climbs into the passenger seat of a man’s expensive sports car – is she after his money? Is he after her looks? Of course, he is after her looks. But as long as he is a humanpreneur, he’ll be with her for more than just her good looks.

What Sports Cars Say About Men

The expensive sports car is a symbol of the man’s wealth and a reflection of his likely high social position and with it signals to the woman his probable ability to provide for a potential family and therefore represents high value to the woman. That’s why the woman can be found getting into the sports car – unless she is a golddigger, of course. Similarly, an ambitious man that is at the early stages of his path to success, striving to tick his boxes, can be of equally high quality, since he’s on his way. This, too, is attractive to women.

In conclusion, then – yes, it is shallow if looks are your only criterion in assessing your potential intimate partners. But it is also an admission of low value. I’ve said it many times – VALUE ATTRACTS VALUE. Build your value, and attract what you then deserve. Because there really is more to looks. If you’re willing to look.

To freedom,

Scotty Stevens
The Humanpreneur
"mecum et incipio et finio"

Disclaimer: As per my Terms And Conditions, this post reflects my philosophy at the time of writing, and may not necessarily correlate with my life's outlook as you read it, now.

Scotty Stevens is the original Humanpreneur. A deep-thinking philosopher, rock n' roll speaker, freedom-fighter, and a practitioner of 'tough love' life coaching. Test drive his curriculum at 'The Scotty Stevens Show', and see if he can't help you become the best you can be with his life-changing methods, tools, forms, philosophy and more!
Go NOW ==> http://ScottyStevens.com

Attention Ezine Editors & Site Owners...
Feel free to reprint this article in its entirety in your ezine, blog or on your site as long as you do not modify the content AT ALL, leave all links in place AND include the resource box as listed above.

What Next? Well, You Can...

- Leave a comment about this post (if enabled for this post)
- Discuss this post in The Scotty Stevens Show FORUM
- Help feed me by kindly making a donation - it's much appreciated!
- (allows you to email, add or send this post)
-   Click here for this article feed
- Hire me for speaking or coaching
- Go to the shop
- Become a member (free)
Related Posts (# Comments) Related Websites

Tags

Categories

All The Latest News, Love, Sex, Relationships & Social Dynamics, Philosophy

Readers Also Viewed

Click here to watch The Conversion Blogging Video

Add New Comment

I hate spam, and can guarantee that your email address will remain private.

Note: Enjoyable comments could be added to the Feedback page.

5 Responses to “Is It Shallow To Go For Looks?”

  1. hudson says:

    shallow is in what people desire.

    in the book of ecclesiastes

    it says that it is better to have aa little with quiet

    than to have alot with much toil and chasing after vain things.

    go figure…

  2. Being an atheist, I take anything written in the Bible with a pinch of salt. Actually, make that a handful.

    And once again, it provides us with one of those classic dichotomies where both choices are from the same, illogical side of the coin; the logical side of the coin is completely dismissed.

    Offering the ultimatum of ‘having a little with ease’ or ‘having a lot with toil and struggle’ is akin to a salesman offering the choice of ‘green car’ or ‘red car’ and omitting the ‘no car’ choice altogether.

    Really, the choice should simply be ‘have a little and be partially happy’ or ‘have a lot and be very happy’. Remember the definition of ‘Shallow’:

    - Lacking depth of intellect, emotion, or knowledge.

    To state that it is BETTER to have a little and be happy than to have a lot and be unhappy, is to assume that that which composes ‘a lot’ is the vain, undesired, and not the result of rational, intelligent thought.

    That which that makes one happy improves the quality of one’s life, and hence is generally considered desirable after rational, logical thought. It’s a natural human longing to pursue happiness, so that which fits the bill is rightfully desired.

    Who is the happiest man:

    1) The man who hasn’t stretched himself in his one and only life, is hard-up because of it, and drives a third-hand, fifteen year old rust bucket of a car?

    Or…

    2) The man who has pushed himself in life, who has exercised his immense capability as a human, has a burgeoning business, is making some nice dough, and has a Ferrari and an Aston Martin in the garage?

    The Bible would tell you that the first man is the happiest, because he ‘has a little and hasn’t toiled much for it’.

    Logic will tell you it is the second man, since he has found his life purpose, is being rewarded for it, and is attaining that which makes his life more comfortable and pleasurable. Hence, that which improves the quality of one’s life is NOT the result of shallow desire, ‘chasing vain things’.

    Indeed, the first man would appear to be the shallow man chasing vain things, since no man in his right mind dreams of driving a fifteen year old rust bucket of a car. And any man that tells you he does is a liar.

    So where do YOU stand on this, Hudson?

    Thanks for the comment ;-)

  3. Melinda says:

    I’m an atheist too.

    It is natural to be initially drawn to the way a person looks. However, inner beauty will ALWAYS trump physical beauty in my eyes. You can be the most physically beautiful person in this world, but if you are cruel and narcissistic, I will fail to see you as anything but ugly.

    It is extremely rare to encounter people who possess both physical and spiritual beauty, as well as intellect.

    It is not shallow to admire the way somebody looks…but never lose sight of the fact that much of what people perceive as being “beautiful” is actually an illusion. Most people require time and effort to achieve a certain look. Very few people can simply be knockout gorgeous without minimal effort. One needs to pay close attention to hygiene above all. If you rarely shower and your breath is foul, you will not be attractive. In addition, beauty is completely subjective. It depends on individual perspective, ideals, and preferences.

    We all have different things that appeal to us on a personal level. I once dated this guy who wasn’t handsome by my definition, but was cute in his own way. However, as time went by, I was turned off by his attitude. He was one of the most hateful individuals I’ve ever met. He was sexist and racist and insecure. He was promiscuous. He smoked pot on a daily basis. He also came from an extremely superficial family. All I could see was ugliness in this person because he was so unkind to everyone around him, unless he needed something. Lots of girls liked him (myself included) because he seemed to be exciting, but the truth is that he was very ugly inside. I stopped talking to him a few years ago because I was so disgusted by the constant verbal and emotional abuse.

    Then I met my husband. He is tall, with blue eyes and a quirky sense of humor. He is intelligent and very cocky about it. I believe most women would like him just because of his playful personality. I was attracted to him the minute we met. I feel that he liked me based on my whole “vibe”. I wasn’t the typical snotty girl he was accustomed to dealing with. I simply enjoyed talking with him like we were old friends. He has this infectious way of making people like him almost immediately. He is perfectly beautiful in my eyes, with all the normal little “imperfections” that all human beings have. I know he didn’t think I was anything special in the early phase of our relationship, but he has grown to appreciate that I am beautiful in my own special way. His ex-girlfriends all tried (unsuccessfully) to push him to commit. I’m the one he married. And I might be a “Plain Jane” or “average” or “dull” or “nothing special” to some people, but I know my worth as an individual.

    That is something no one can take away from me ever again.

  4. oyun says:

    Type your comment here…Then I met my husband. He is tall, with blue eyes and a quirky sense of humor. He is intelligent and very cocky about it. I believe most women would like him just because of his playful personality. I was attracted to him the minute we met. I feel that he liked me based on my whole “vibe”. I wasn’t the typical snotty girl he was accustomed to dealing with. I simply enjoyed talking with him like we were old friends. He has this infectious way of making people like him almost immediately.